Topic: The Rise of the Medici

The Medici was a merchant family that came to dominate the politics and economy of the city of Florence. Over time, from at least the time of Cosimo de’Medici, they inserted themselves into the Florentine ruling elite and began to dominate the city’s political and economic culture. By the time of Lorenzo the Magnificent, they became the de facto rulers of the city. But, their patronage of the arts set the tone, and they were major players in the foundation of Renaissance culture in Florence.

After reading and viewing the assigned material, discuss the following in your initial post:

What strategies did the Medici employ in their rise to power? What roles did they play in patronage in Florence? How was the Medici able to leave such an indelible legacy on the history of the city? Include at least one additional resource other than the textbook in your post. Your post should be about 250 words.
Currently 0 writers are viewing this order

Topic: Arnold, R. Douglass. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. Yale University Press.

Arnold, R. Douglass. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. Yale University Press.

My paper needs to be 5 pages long. I have attached the rubric.

Book reviews should not only tell what a book is about, but also whether it achieves the goals that the author presents. In this way a book review goes beyond the scope of a typical book report and provides a critical reaction to the book in addition to a summary. Book reviews should include a short introduction, summary of the book’s content (about three-four pages), and an evaluation of the book (two-four pages). The evaluation section should describe the major presuppositions and implications of the book as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s argument.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Topic: Review Task

Order Description

review your partner’s new paragraph from the Paragraph Task and offer constructive
feedback for revision

In reviewing your partner’s paragraph, you should consider the following with regards
to their chosen rhetorical situation for the new paragraph:
• Paragraph type and structure
• Sentence variety, order, and structure
• Use of rhetorical appeals
• Incorporation of research
• Grammar and punctuation
• Tone and voice
• Word choice, including use of jargon and definitions
• Flow and transition
You will then reflect on the peer review process, including:
• How your application of style and method considers the rhetorical situation of a
peer review
• The strategies, techniques, and/or resources you have used to provide feedback to
your partner
• Your experience with the peer review process
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Topic: Defensive Developmentalism

Discuss your understanding of why defensive developmentalism, as practiced by the Ottoman Empire, Egypt, and Persia was unsuccessful? Could these three Middle Eastern nations have done anything different to make it work? Explain.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Topic: Ideas

What were the main beliefs of such Muslim fundamentalists as the Wahhabis of Arabia and Muslim modernists like as Malkom Khan and Jamal al Din al Afghani. Discuss what impact these ideas might have on many people of the Middle East today.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Topic: I would like the topic to surround the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Order Description

Congressional Politics Final Paper Assignment
Write a paper that either (1) analyzes a specific election for a U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives seat, or (2) analyze a specific policy decision made by the U.S. Congress. Start with a clear thesis statement, and then defend it using your research. You must demonstrate and use key terms and concepts from Davidson, Arnold, and Mayhew. You must identify key political actors and evaluate their role in supporting or opposing the policy or candidate. 10-15 pages, double spaced. 10-15 sources. APSA citation style. Students are expected to turn in a scholarly analysis of a political event, and, therefore, should avoid “I feel” statements.

Learning Outcomes
Demonstrate knowledge of key terms and concepts from Davidson,
Arnold, and Mayhew
Demonstrate ability to analyze a certain election or policy decision using theories discussed in class
Demonstrate ability to research within the field of Political Science
Demonstrate ability to clearly support your thesis using correct grammar and APSA style citation
Demonstrate ability to identify key political actors (Interest groups, policy makers, committee chairs, individuals, etc.) in their interactions in supporting or opposing the policy or candidate

Assessment will be based on the following criteria
Thought (10 points): Clear effort is shown in both research and writing. Adequate sources are used. Paper is well organized.
Concepts (25 points): Proper use of concepts and key terms from Davidson, Arnold, and Mayhew.
Summary/Analysis (30 points): Thorough summary and analysis of event (either election or policy decision), properly using theories discussed in class.
Actors (25 points): Identification of key political actors/groups.
Grammar/Format (10 points): Follow APSA formatting and citation rules, complete with cover page and page numbers. Use correct spelling and grammar.

Questions to address in your analysis if you choose the election option:
Why did one candidate win over the other?
What was the political stance of the candidates?
What was the political climate of the state or district?
What strategies did the candidates take to pursue victory?
How can the readings from class be applied to the election?
Were there any important interest groups, contributors, endorsers, etc. involved in the race?
Was an incumbent running? If so, how did that affect the campaign?
What role did the media play? How did the candidates use media? What kind of ads were used?
What major concepts from our reading can be applied to the election? (credit claiming, incumbency advantage, the two congresses, etc.)
Did the candidates use a GOTV campaign?
Any other questions that you feel are pertinent to answer.

Questions to address in your analysis if you choose the policy decision option:
How does federalism (the states) and separation of powers (the president/executive branch, and the courts) factor into this congressional decision?
What role did interest groups play in the policy decision?
How did media follow or affect the policy decision?
Be sure to discuss how the bill passed through committee and both houses.
What congressmen were involved on both sides of the issue? Can you identify factors that play into whether or not a congressmen supported the issue or was against it?
What role did the parties play?
What role did leadership play?
What was the eventual outcome? Was it successful?
Did either side appeal to the public on the issue? What was public opinion on the issue? Is the public satisfied with the outcome?
What major concepts from our reading can be applied to the policy decision? (credit claiming, symbolism, the two congresses, etc.)
Any other questions that you feel are pertinent to answer.

Sources:
Students should support their assertions with scholarly evidence or evidence from reputed news sources such as The New York Times or The Washington Post. For the elections option, local news sources will also be expected.

Pull from these book sources:

Davidson, Roger H., Walter J. Oleszek, Frances E. Lee, and Eric Schickler. 2016. Congress & Its Members (15th Edition). CQ Press.

Arnold, R. Douglass. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. Yale University Press.

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection (2nd Edition). Yale University Press.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Topic: The Israeli/Palestinian conflict – Annotated Bibliography

The Topic Choice: The Israeli/Palestinian conflict
Overall Project Points: attached

In Module 1 you chose a topic for Project 2. Now in this module you will write an annotated bibliography of some source you plan to use in your paper, due in Module 7.

First begin by reading through the directions for the Project 2 paper due in Module 7.

Your annotated bibliography should include an annotation of about 150-200 words for five sources you intend to use in your Project 2 paper. You may include course texts for up to two of the five sources, but at least three must come from outside research. These outside sources should be appropriate scholarly sources, including peer-reviewed journals or books from the Excelsior College library.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Assignment 2: LASA 1: Ethical Case Study Analysis Paper

Directions:You will be graded on the process you used to arrive at your recommendations and the reasoning behind picking a specific recommendation (and not the actual recommendation itself). .The body of the paper should be no less than 5 pages in length. Your paper should be double-spaced, in 12 point Times New Roman font, with normal 1-inch margins, written in APA style, and free of typographical and grammatical errors. It should include a title page with a running head, an abstract, and a reference page.Save the paper as AU_PSY430_M3_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc and submit it to the by .