Author: chris

Before commencing work you need to fully familiarise yourself with the ‘Mixed assessment candidate
guidelines’, including:
• Font type and size to be used in your assignments (Arial – size 11).
• Rules relating to referencing third party work.
• Penalties for contravention of the rules relating to plagiarism and collaboration.
• Deadline for the submission of coursework assignment (i.e. within 6 months from the enrolment date).
Important notes
• Make sure you read each question carefully – marks will not be awarded for irrelevant material.
• Check the number of marks allocated to each question and ensure that your answer is sufficient in length
and breadth.
• This assignment consists of 10 questions which range between 10 and 30 marks.
• Learning outcomes 1 and 2 form the foundational knowledge for all other learning outcomes.
• Questions 1 to 8 follow the syllabus learning outcomes 3 to 10 in order.
• Questions 9 and 10 encompass a number of syllabus learning outcomes.
• The total marks available are 200. You need to obtain 120 marks to pass this assignment.
• There is not always a single correct answer for a question and marks will be awarded for all valid
responses.

Appendix 1 – Plagiarism

It is important to understand what plagiarism is and how it can be avoided. The Joint
Council for Qualifications (JCQ) defines plagiarism as: “Unacknowledged copying from
published sources (including the internet) or incomplete referencing”. The following also
constitute plagiarism:
• Copying or amending sections of work from a friend/colleague.
• Having a friend/family member dictate something to you.
• Copying and pasting from the internet without citing the source.
• Copying or using directly from a study text quotation without citing the source.
• Paraphrasing without including reference to the source of the paraphrase.
• Working with another person, or using another person’s work to write your assignment.
Within the text of your assignments you should use the following formats to attribute work
to its author(s).
Quotations
When using quotations from books, websites or journal articles you should cite the author
and the year of publication then use the quote in quotation marks, as below:
As Crystal (2006) points out: “Learning vocabulary is always a matter of building up fields
of words.”
If, however, you would like to use a longer example than your sentence allows, use the
author(s) name, year of publication, indent the quotation and place the page number of the
quotation, at the end:
As Crystal (2006) points out:
Learning vocabulary is always a matter of building up fields of words. And we do that by
comparing words with other words. That is how parents teach children. (Crystal, 2006, p29)
Paraphrasing (This does not apply to other candidates’ work)
Paraphrasing is where you encapsulate another person’s original idea, argument or
conclusion in your own words. It is still necessary to attribute those ideas to the author,
and you can do this by using the formatting outlined for direct quotations, taking care to
include the author’s surname and the year of publication.
There are several methods you can adopt. Try them all a few times. You’ll soon find out
which ones work best for you.
1. Read small sections of your notes or the text you are studying (say a paragraph at a
time). Cover your notes and then write the section in your own words.
2. For every sentence of text you want to paraphrase write two of your own. Remember
it often helps if you identify the main idea then give an example of your own and then
explain how your example fits with the main idea.
3. Take a small section (again say a paragraph). Write down the key words. Cover the
original and then use the key words to help you write a paragraph in your own words.
Don’t change any technical words, numbers or mathematical or scientific formulae.
However feel free to change the everyday words to those of your own.
4. Remember to include a reference to the person who first wrote what you have
paraphrased.
If you can’t paraphrase the source then you may need to think about putting the idea in as
a quotation.”
(Using sources. A guide for students: Find it – Check it – Credit it, p 16–17. Ofqual, 2010.)
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Assignment: Business Brief: Franklin Fan Company – MRP

Purpose
To assess your ability to
• Perform a manual MRP explosion.
• Discuss the good and bad points of the MRP implementation.
• Recommend how to improve the resource planning process.
• Integrate established operation management principles into the discussion.
• Write a business report based on 5-step critical thinking decision making model.

Action Items
1. Review the Brief Rubric – Franklin Fan Company-MRP.
2. Read the Franklin Fan Company – MRP case.
Case Background: You are to take on the role of Marley. Address your brief to Dan Block and Ed Spriggs. Your instructor will review the MPS portion of the MRP explosion with you before the MRP explosion can be completed.
3. Download the 5-Step Critical-Thinking Decision-Making Model.
a. Complete Step 1: Identify the problem(s) and uncertainties based on the assigned problem.
b. Complete Step 2: Obtain Information addressing the problem(s) from Step 1 and the following:
i. A manual MRP explosion for the ceiling fan for the next 6 weeks (beginning with the current week).
ii. A manual MRP explosion for the personal fan for the next 6 weeks (beginning with the current week).
iii. Identification of the good and bad points of MRP implementation at the Franklin Fan Company.
iv. How can the resource planning process at Franklin Fan Company be improved upon?
c. Complete Step 3: Make predictions about the future on the matrix.
d. Complete Step 4: Make decisions by choosing among the alternatives on the matrix.
4. Review the Business Brief Guidelines and Sample Business Brief for correct MBA Business Brief formatting.
5. In MBA Business Brief format, write a one-page analysis incorporating the following:
a. Business Brief header – The first half of opening paragraph is to provide a synopsis of the current MRP system. The second half of the opening paragraph is state the problem (From Step 1 of the model).
b. Analysis header – The analytical section should be based on your personal assessment of the information you obtained from Steps 2 and 3 of the model. Provide only key relevant information and logical discussion in support of your findings.
c. Conclusion header – This section should state your recommendation based on your analysis of the case information and situation outcome. (From Step 4 of the model). Your recommendation should be supported by your analysis section.
d. APA citation(s) and reference(s).
Note: You are expected to compose your Business Brief utilizing the concepts learned in MBA 707. Specifically, Chapters 4, 5, and 6 from the textbook: Bovee, C., & Thill, J. (2015). Business Communication Today (13th ed.). Bullet points and direct quotes are not to be used.
6. Check your writing style by using Grammarly and correct your business brief as needed.
7. Submit your Business Brief to turnitin.com.
a. Read the Originality Report you receive from turnitin.com.
b. Make any modifications as needed to your Business Brief. This may include adding proper citations or better paraphrasing.
8. Attach the following appendices to your paper:
a. Appendix A: Manual MRP explosion for the ceiling fan and personal fan (completed WK6-STUDENT SPREADSHEET-FF-MRP).
b. Appendix A: Completed 5-Step Critical Thinking Decision Making Model.
c. Appendix B: Grading Rubric for the assignment
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

The subject is advance research methods: In this 3000 word essay you are required to describe the research question and proposed research design for your dissertation project. You must then critically discuss your chosen design (consider the advantages and disadvantages of your chosen design. What will it tell you? What can’t it tell you?). You must then propose an alternative design to address your research question. When considering your alternative research design you should assume that you have unrestricted access to resources. The new design can have a larger scope than a master’s project. Again critically discuss the merits of this alternative design. Give a clear justification for your final chosen design (alongside the methodological merits of your chosen design you may also like to consider practical and ethical issues).
Since your dissertation project is a systematic review you must describe the design of your review (including search strategy and data extraction) and an alternative empirical design to answer your research question.
Please ensure that you spell check your work, use 1.5 line spacing and use Harvard referencing system.
Clearly outline your proposed research question and study aims
Present a detailed description of your proposed research design including methodology, data collection methods and sampling
Critically evaluate your chosen research design
Demonstrate an awareness of competing research designs by describing an alternative design to answer your research question and critically evaluate this design
Use logical argument to justify your final choice of research design
Exhibit appropriate presentational skills. e.g. style, use of references, appropriate to an M level course
Currently 0 writers are viewing this order

Topic: Emotional Experiences conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia-Carers Perspective

STRUCTURE OF RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Title, researcher’s name. Brief summary statement of purpose and design (around 200 words)
Background and Literature Review (around 1000 words)
Discussion of relevant literature that informs and ‘positions’ your topic in relation to current knowledge
Remember to include definitions and description of key relevant terms
Aim and Objectives. Research question or Hypothesis (if relevant).
Methodology (around 1250 words)
Set out your proposed methodology; give a clear rationale for using your chosen approach (i.e. this may include a brief discussion about issues of validity or if a quantitative research, power calculations of sample size. Include:
some basic definition and description of the methods
¥ indicate proposed sample size and recruitment strategy
Ethical issues (around 1000 words)
This should cover the ethical perspective of each key stage of the proposal fieldwork process: recruitment strategy; conducting fieldwork (data collection); data management and storage; dissemination. Indicate what supporting documents will be required and at which stage
Note that the actual supporting documents must be submitted with your ethics application form (Part 2) . You will be carrying elements of this section onto your ethics application.
Timetable ( around 100 words)
Dissemination plans (up to 150 words)
A brief summary of key points
References (not counted in word count)
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Module 5 Course Objectives;
During completion of this module, students will Identify a process for selecting effective outcomes, to include outcomes that are culturally sensitive, for performance/process measurement in various healthcare settings AND Analyze relationships between outcomes and resource utilization AND Value clinical measurement as a process for improving healthcare delivery.

ASSIGNMENT:
1. Critique a quality or quality improvement article related to their PICOT question or general topic(please see order ID 81661610 PICOT details to complete this project).

READINGS:
Review Melnyk, B., & Fine-out, E. (2010 or 2014). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. (2nd edition or 3rd edition) Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins chapters on PICOT question development and format
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

In ACCC v Coles [2014] FCA 1405, Gordon J at [102] observed (emphasis added):

Coles’ misconduct was serious. I reject Coles’ submission that these contraventions are somehow distinguishable, or of a less serious nature, because they did not involve vulnerable consumers. Coles’ conduct did not involve vulnerable consumers. Coles’ conduct did involve vulnerable suppliers – some of Coles’ smaller suppliers…. Indeed, their lack of size was one of the reasons why they were classified as Tier 3 Suppliers and targeted by Coles. These vulnerable suppliers were up against Coles – the second largest retailer of grocery products in Australia. It is unsurprising that Coles admits that it had substantially stronger bargaining power. It is difficult to envisage circumstances involving a larger disparity in bargaining power.

In their press release advising that they were bringing action against Woolworths for breach of s21, the ACCC noted(emphasis added):

The ACCC also alleges that these requests were made in circumstances where Woolworths was in a substantially stronger bargaining position than the suppliers, did not have a pre-existing contractual entitlement to seek the payments, and either knew it did not have or was indifferent to whether it had a legitimate basis for requesting a Mind the Gap payment from every targeted Tier B supplier.

1. What is meant by ‘bargaining power’? In what way is this the same or different to ‘market power’ in the context of s46? Could these actions against Coles and Woolworths been run using s46 instead of s21? If this is the case, then do any changes to s46 also have to consider s21?

Support your discussion by reference to case law and the discussion surrounding the Harper Review.
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order

Please see attached. Warning: this order cannot be assigned to writer 271171 350508 341454 422118 422208 409144 403285 419370 347759 326319 15193 because each writer can only take the order once.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Note: You will find the case study on the site under Assignment 2 resources heading You will also be provided with some references to assist you (on portal under Assignment label).
Assignment 2 Requirements: The following guidelines should assist you as you plan and undertake your assignment: You are asked to carefully study the case as presented, and to research and read as much as you can from literature sources that relate to the various concepts evident in the case. Literature sources can include textbooks, academic papers and business journal papers. You should use these reference sources to support the discussion you present in your assignment paper, as you respond to the four questions asked.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

12 course work questions x 138 words long. Topic is Business decision making and Analysis.

Answer each question with maybe a reference from the text book and one of your own sources.

Read both uploads carefully and answer the questions in yellow highlight

thanks
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

As you can see the first assignment didn\’t receive a good result so I need this one to be better so I pass the course.
Just a reminder I am in Australia not USA so terminology and spelling are quite different.

Thank you
Rose
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order