Author: chris

You are required to critically analyse the current strategic position of the organisation chosen by your group for the presentation. Your analysis should include:
• An evaluation of the external business environment in which your chosen organisation operates
• A critical assessment of the strategic resource capability of your chosen organisation
• An examination of the extent to which your chosen organisation is in strategic fit with its environment

In both tasks you should use relevant theories/paradigms reviewed during the course of the Module MOD001147 as a focus for your analysis.

Text that must be used Lynch R (2011) Strategic Management 6th ed. FT Prentice Hall
Your group must select a “live” case from business and explore the various strategic issues related to the case.
The presentation should include:
• An evaluation of the external business environment in which your chosen organisation operates
• A critical assessment of the strategic resource capability of your chosen organisation
• An examination of the extent to which your chosen organisation is in strategic fit with its environment
• A critical appraisal of a range of strategic options available to your chosen company
• Specification of your preferred option, with justification

Your group’s presentation will last for a maximum of 25 minutes plus 5 minutes for questions.

Your group should provide TWO printed copies of the visual aids used plus ONE brief written outline of the role each member of the group played in the preparation & delivery of the presentation. It is essential to demonstrate that each member of the group plays a full and active part in this assignment.
Each group will have a maximum 5 members.

Specific Assessment Criteria and Marking Rubric

Mark Learning Outcome
1. Clarity of purpose and achievement of objectives 10% 3-4
2. Level and depth of analysis 40% 3-4
3. Evaluation of strategic fit 10% 3-4
4. Presentation of strategic choices 30% 3-4
5. Structure and standard of presentation 10% 3-4
TOTAL MARKS 100%

1st slide. Research Method or Process. 2 types of process Phenomenological (qualitative analysis) and 2) Postivitic (quantitate analysis )

2nd slide. Data triangulation .

3rd slide. Research objectives

4th slide Preseantion objectives

5th slide Source of data.

Writer i have chosen 8 slides to be done you can increase the information as you see fit but this is the general lay out

We are planing to use air France when the last crash occurred 2009-2010
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order

research and discuss the viability of Atomic Energy production for domestic use in the United States

Discussion: Research Design and t Tests: How Are They Connected?
The best way to solidify your understanding of statistical testing is to actually engage in performing some data analysis. This week you will work with a real, secondary dataset to construct a research question, perform a t test, and interpret the results.

Whether in a scholarly or practitioner setting, good research and data analysis should have the benefit of peer feedback. For this Discussion, you will post your response to the hypothesis test, along with the results. Be sure and remember that the goal is to obtain constructive feedback to improve the research and its interpretation, so please view this as an opportunity to learn from one another.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review the Learning Resources and the media programs related to t tests.
Using the SPSS software, open the High School Longitudinal Study dataset found in this week’s Learning Resources and construct a research question that involves a comparison of a means test.
By Day 3
Use SPSS to answer the research question you constructed and post your response to the following:
What is your research question?
What is the null hypothesis for your question?
What research design would align with this question?
What comparison of means test was used to answer the question (be sure to defend the use of the test using the article you found in your search)?
What dependent variable was used and how is it measured?
What independent variable is used and how is it measured?
If you found significance, what is the strength of the effect?
Identify your research question and explain your results for a lay audience, what is the answer to your research question?
Be sure to support your Main Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

The Exam

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE/INSTRUCTION 1 (30% of total grade)(DON\’T JUST WRITE- EXPLAIN WHY IN YOUR ANSWERS)

Describe in your own words the benefits and risks associated with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Make recommendations about how to improve the Act and streamline the process while taking into account limited budgetary resources. Please limit your answer to three (2) double-spaced pages.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE/INSTRUCTION 2 (70% of total grade)(FOR THIS QUESTION, YOU ARE WRITING A REAL (PROPOSED LAW IN THE SAME FORMAT LAWS ARE WRITTEN IN REAL LIFE-**NOT ESSAY STYLE PLEASE**)

QUESTION: After re-reading the discussion boards on state-based computer abuse law, draft a model penal code for computer crimes. You may conduct additional research as you see necessary. Your goal is to take the best of what each state has to offer and produce one unified state-based statute that can be recommended for adoption by any state wishing to update or improve its computer abuse law. Limit answers to 4 double-spaced pages).

Write a 3000 word report which identifies at least one social determinant of health and critically analyse how it is being addressed.

LO2. Discuss selected current health and social care policies and apply them to different settings
LO3. Explain contemporary public health provision in relation to the organisation of health and social care
LO4. Identify the social determinants of health and explain their relationship to health inequalities

Students must refer to relevant academic sources and use the Harvard Referencing Style
Word Limit: 3,000 words (excluding references)

My topic is \”Individual Lifestyle as a Social determinant of Health In the London Borough of Lambeth in relation to Dementia\”.

Assignment 2

This assignment is worth 100 of the module mark. Word length 3000 words (do not exceed word limit). Do not include References in the word count.

Assignment Brief :

The management of risk is proving to be one of the most difficult tasks for the project management profession. How can risk be managed effectively and who should be responsible for this task?

You are required to critically analyze the concept of risk; discuss how it can be measured and ranked and outline how a project risk management strategy may be constructed for a complex project involving international partner organizations. In completing this assignment, you should address how appropriate practices can assist in minimizing risk for your project.

Relates to Learning Outcomes:

• Locate, synthesize and critically evaluate recent/current information from a wide range of published literature in the area of Project Risk and Procurement Management.
• Apply knowledge of the theory and practice of Project Risk and Procurement Management to develop insights into and solve current problems.
• Critically evaluate the use of complex models of Project Risk and Procurement Management; systematically and creatively making sound judgements based on the systematic analysis and creative synthesis of ideas.
Critically and effectively assess the value of theories, concepts and models to the practice of Project Risk and Procurement Management.

Brief from the lecturer :

Define risk,
Say what’s common and different about them,
Explain project risk management and why are project risk different from everyday risk
What kinds of risk is difficult to handle
How can risk be measured?
How can risk be right
what’s a complex project
Why international makes it more difficult in terms of language. Culture and attitude

Discuss the impact of microfinance projects in refugee camps, syrian refugee camp.

Team Process Reflection Paper Instructions

In this paper you will use the concepts you have learned in the textbook Whetten and Cameron to describe and analyze your team\’s processes and outcomes. You will need to describe in detail the following:
•how you achieved consensus on the topic;.
•how you determined the tasks and responsibilities;.
•assess the strengths and weaknesses of the team and the reasons behind them;.
•analyze your own behavior with the team, and aspects you would improve about yourself. .
•suggest changes that would improve performance if the team were to continue for another semester, and.
•describe the impact this experience has had on you as a leader and team member. .
•You should reflect on the group assignment results, and the meaning you derive from this example of leadership to your own life. .
•Describe the events and decisions that occurred in relation to your project, the interactions between team members, and interactions with others. .

THE UPS AND DOWNS OF TEAMWORK:
1.Were you interdependent in your tasks? Did one person carry the weight for the group? .
2.Were you inclusive? .
3.How did you organize the work? .
4.What kind of decision – making process did you have? Did you take too long to decide things? Were you to quick to decide and not consider enough alternatives? .
5.Were there aspects of group think in your group? .
6.Was there team problem solving? Did you confront mistakes or lack of follow- through? .
7.Was there a positive relationship between the team’s goals and your personal goals? .
8.Did you make time as a group to reflect upon your process? .

AS A TEAM MEMBER
1.Did you compromise your standards just to get agreement? .
2.Did you feel invited to express your individual creativity? .
3.Did you feel frustrated along the way? Was it possible to discuss this within the group? .
4.Did you evolve as a team member? Were you able to think more deeply about aspects of leadership, given the team experience and the content of your presentation topic?

Could You create a question of your choice based on motivation theories and relate to HR.

based on this structure:

Guidance on the structure of a Dissertation
Note this is an indicative structure only

Chapter One-Introduction

The purpose of this chapter is to justify the topic of the dissertation or research project as being worthy of research.

To do this successful the student should:
Introduce the topic and its context.
Locate the topic within current academic literature.
Draw from non-academic literature sources (e.g. specific company literature, government reports, newspapers etc.) to demonstrate the wider relevance of the topic.
Show the contemporary nature of the study.
Present the research questions to be studied as a logical consequence of the argument they have constructed.
Summarise the chapter and introduce the next chapter.

(Proportion of word count, approximately 10%)

Chapter Two-Literature Review
Do not cut and paste text into the literature review.

The purpose of this chapter is to review and critically analyse the academic literature pertinent to the research question(s) – this chapter also provides material to be used in the data collection stage.

To do this successfully the student should:
Ensure the reviewed literature is relevant by using the research question(s) as sub-headings, at least in the draft stage.
Demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of the academic debates relevant to their topic.
Critically analyse key contributions, identifying their strengths and weaknesses, testing their internal consistency, and acknowledging and presenting the inevitable counter-arguments.
Avoid presenting literature uncritically – this does not demonstrate understanding.
Avoid presenting only the positive side of an argument, as a researcher he/she must acknowledge and evaluate the negative aspects of their chosen topic.
Summarise the chapter and introduce the next chapter.

(Word count 40%)

Chapter Three-Research Methodology

The purpose of this chapter is to justify the research methodology chosen by the student as following accepted academic convention.
To do this successfully the student should:
Support and substantiate his/her claims throughout with reference to appropriate research methodology literature.
Justify the research strategy chosen.
Ensure the strategy is consistent with his/her identified research approach (qualitative or quantitative for example).
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the type of research approach chosen and the data collection methods employed.
Identify the limitations of the research.
Summarise the chapter and introduce the next chapter.

(Word count 15%)

Chapter Four-Data Presentation and Analysis

The purpose of this chapter is to present the data and analyse the findings in relation to the literature reviewed in chapter two.
To do this successfully the student should:
Ensure relevance by using the research questions as sub-headings, at least in the draft stage.
Present the data in a clear and coherent manner, using tables, graphs etc. as he/she sees fit.
Critically discuss the findings in relation to the literature in chapter two, identifying areas of agreement and disagreement, and give some thought as to why the results he/she obtained were so.
Identify any results that were puzzling or unexpected and consider why this was so.
Summarise the chapter and introduce the next chapter.

(Word count 25%)

Chapter Five-Conclusions and Discussion

The purpose of this chapter is to conclude the study by drawing together all the key points and to identify recommendations drawn from the research.

To do this successfully the student should:
Conclude the study effectively by drawing together all the main issues and presenting them in a coherent narrative.
Reflect upon the process of the research identifying what went well and what should have been done differently.
Identify the limitations of the study.
Identify any areas of further study highlighted during the research process.
Include any reflections on how the research has affected the author personally.
Summarise the whole of the study.

(Word count 10%)

Add primary data (Questionnaire etc) quantitative and qualitative data.

also a conceptual map
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Application 2: Small-Scale Qualitative Research Project—The Interview Guide

Qualitative research questions are open-ended, and typically restate the purpose of a study in specific terms. These questions should start with \”what\” or \”how\” instead of \”why\”. While you are developing your Central qualitative research question, you might begin by considering what type of questions to ask. Keep in mind that your research question for this assignment should be one that can be answered, at least in part, by this interview. Questions that provoke a yes/no response are not permitted in a doctoral study interview guide.

For this Application:

Review this week\’s media resource regrading conducting interviews
Write your initial interview guide and post it for peer review by Day 3 under this week\’s Discussion \”Qualitative Research Question.\” Refer to the course readings to assist you to develop an appropriate interview guide.
Revise your interview guide as needed.
By Day 7 submit your completed final draft interview guide template to the Week 2 Application 2 submission area.

Submit your final interview guide to both the Submission link and Discussion board by Day 7.