Author: chris

TOPIC/ASSIGNMENT/OBJECTIVES:

Upon completion of Module 2:

1. The student will be able to manipulate the organization chart of financially challenged health care organization.
2. Meets course objectives #1 and #3:

Objective 1-Demonstrate knowledge of theories and principles of leadership, administration, and management as they apply to mid-level nursing or healthcare administrative practice.

Objective 3- Analyze the social changes and trends that influence mid-level management in health care settings.

READING ASSIGNMENT:
1. Liebler, J. G. and C. R. McConnell. (2012). Management Principles for Health Professionals (6th ed.). Jones and Barlett Publishers Sudbury, MA
Chapter 6

2. American Nurses Association. (2009). Scope and standards for nurse administrators (2nd ed.). ANA: Washington, DC.

ANA Scope and Standard #14

ASSIGNMENT:

Obtain the organizational chart for the entity you work for(if you are not working right now, google \”healthcare organizational chart\” for a sample organizational chart. Answer the following questions about your organization:

1. Is your organization centralized or decentralized?

2. Which management position appears to have the broadest span of control? why?

3. What is the single longest chain of command in the organization?

NOTE TO WRITER: Please search this information concerning the above information on the University of Texas Medical Branch if unable to locate this particular organization, it is okay to use sample organizational chart as stated above.

Primary Post:

Assume your organization has experienced a major loss of business activity over the previous year. A change in your organizational structure musr occur in order to remain a viable entity in the health care marketplace of your community. Please describe how you would go about flattening your organizational chart by one level in at least 2 of the principles chains of command on your chart. Support your changes with references from the management literature (health care or other)
Currently 0 writers are viewing this order

TOPIC/ASSIGNMENT/Objectives:

Upon the completion of Module 3 the student will be able to discuss the role of a PI professional.

READING ASSIGNMENT:

1. Liebler, J. G. and C. R. McConnell. (2012). Management Principles for Health Professionals (6th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Publishers Sudbury, MA
Chapter 13

2. American Nurses Association. (2009). Scope and standards for nurse administrators (2nd ed.). ANA: Washington, DC.
ANA Scope and Standards Standard 3,7

Discussion:

Aristotle who lived from 384 BC-322 BCC was a Greek philosopher,scientist, student of Plato and Alexander the Great\’s teacher. He said this about quality, \”Quality is not an act. It is a habit\”

Primary post: Please comment on the above quote. Formulate your comment based on one of the four Performance Improvement Focci noted on pages 423-426 of your text.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Assignment Task
As a consultant for an international innovative organisation of your choice, you have been tasked with producing a strategic growth report for your chosen organisation as they embark on a growth strategy and are considering introducing a new product to their product-portfolio in order to be more competitive in the market.
Within this report, you are expected to demonstrate how your chosen international organisation qualifies as ‘innovative’. In addition to this, you are to critically analyse the main components of the New Product Development (NPD) process and recommend ways by which it can be integrated into your strategic growth report.
BREAKDOWN
1. STRATEGIC GROWTH REPORTS OF YOUR CHOSEN ORGANISATION AS IT EMBARKS ON GROWTH STRATEGY AND CONSIDERING INTRODUCTION OF A NEW PRODUCT TO THEIR PRODUCT PORTFOLIO IN ORDER TO BE MORE COMPETITIVE.
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order

Choose two (2) situations to write about.
Use at least seven (7) chapters of your choice from the text and one (1) video of your choice and type to explain (specifically) how the person, with or without the support of their friends, may overcome the situation presented to them. Since this is a fictional situation, you may add to the situation, but you cannot take anything away from it.

Link to book
https://wps.aw.com/bc_donatelle_access_13/225/57660/14761109.cw/index.html
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order

Please Proofread and fix any gramatical errors. Thank you
Petition for Reinstatement
Dear Committee,
This letter constitutes my Petition for Reinstatement to X School of Law. There were extraordinary circumstances that led to my deficient academic performance. Such extraordinary circumstances are the reasons why I failed to achieve the minimum G.P.A required to continue at X School of Law. My failure to perform much better during my first semester at the school is because of a crossed country moving with wife and children from State A to B; difficulty to found housing in the first 4 weeks while in school, which lead to my lack of preparation and concentration in class which caused my reading to be behind. Moreover, I was not aware of Law School writing format in which I spent a consistent amount of time preparing for class and the exams. I also spent a huge amount of time studying bluebook in which I did well. Furthermore, the load of courses and the balance between classes and family during the first two months of class in a new city were an issue that got me confused most of the times and such confusion lead to my final exams. As you can see, I did ok in my writing class and I passed the bluebook.
If reinstated, the quality of my academic performance at the college of Law would significantly improve. I am now settle in the city of Charlotte and my wife is the primary caregiver to our two children. Additionally, I now know the expectation in Law School because I had a taste of it, I know the writing format; in Fact, I passed my legal writing class, and I know I can be very successful in law school. I plan on going part time with option to retake all classes I earn below a grade of C. Going part time will help me to spend time on my reading practice more hypos and earn a better GPA. I am in a much better position than I was when I started class during the spring semester. I am now spending my summer classes studying law school in general and the expectation in each class. Also, my legal writing’s professor recommended some free online grammar classes (mooc.com and coursera.com) for the summer. I am now well prepared to continue law school in the fall if I am given a chance. I move to the United States because I believe America is a land of a second chance opportunity in life. I am requesting that I be given a second chance so I demonstrate my capacity to do well in law school. I know I can do this, and I know I was not well prepared for the spring semester. In fact, I requested my admission be deferred to summer 2016 and was rejected. For my Master degree, I took two classes a semester and as a result, I got a very good G.P.A. I know myself and I would not want to force myself in law school if I do not believe I can do it. I know I would not waste my time. I will be very successful. But, I must go part time and study full time. This way, I will do very good and would eventually earn the Dean’s list of honor. I believe going part time is my best option for success, and I please ask for your discretion to give me a second chance to proof myself.
Respectfully Submitted
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Choose a specific area of violence (suicide among st men) and critically review the resources and information that are available through websites (or a specific website) related to this area using an evaluative checklist. Identify any gaps in the available resources and make recommendations as to how these could be addressed.
• Chose a specific website for me that focuses on suicide among st men
• I would prefer it to be a current website, it doesn’t have to be a good one because the aim is to critically evaluate it
• Please include a link to the chooses website in the essay

Evaluative checklist

Credibility:
• Check for information about the author’s education, training and experience in the field.
• Look for biographical information such as the author’s title (Dr., Prof. etc.) and career history.
• Is there evidence of the author’s standing amongst their peers?
Accuracy:
• Is there a date on the information?
• Is the information current, or are the ideas now out dated?
• Is the information detailed, exact and comprehensive?
Reasonableness:
• Does the article present a balanced argument?
• Is the tone of the writing reasoned?
• How objective is the author?
• Is the information consistent?
• Are there conflicts of interest?
Support:
• Where did the information come from?
• Are the sources for the information listed?
• Is there a bibliography?
• What support does the author give for the information provided?
• Is contact information provided for the author?
Don’t forget conclusion

Learning outcome: Identify and review available preventative and supportive resources that currently exist within a Public Health context.

Marking criteria:

Percentage
Descriptor

90-100%

Outstanding
Exceptionally detailed and original response to the assignment, with critical use of independently sourced contextual material. Outstanding demonstration of linked understanding and application of relevant theory, concepts and models. Extremely well structured with high level of analysis.

No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

80-89%

Excellent
Very full, independent response to the assignment with totally relevant material which is well beyond any module input, demonstrating independent study. Excellent understanding and application of relevant theory, concepts and models. Very clear logical structure.

Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

70-79%

Very good
Full response to the assignment with all content relevant and focused. Very good understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Application of appropriate theory to examples/practice, demonstrating a rigorous approach to a
variety of ideas, contexts and frameworks.

Few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

60-69%

Good
Answers most if not all detailed aspects of the question. Content mainly relevant and accurate. Good knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and application of theoretical models. Evidence of a developing appreciation of contextual issues.

Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate

50-59%

Competent
Main issues addressed and solid attempt to answer question. Some relevant content applied. Sound knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and identification of main issues

Some repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

40-49%

Pass
Satisfactory attempt to address question/issues with some content relevant to assignment topic. Material engages with relevant module materials, but largely repeats taught input and lacks development or personal interpretation. Some general understanding of topic theory and concepts. Lacks coherence.

30-39%

Fail
Some learning outcomes and / or assessment criteria not met.

Questions not answered fully. Content not wholly relevant. Little or no evidence of understanding of relevant theory. Very repetitive of taught input – no development or application. The use of extensive quoted passages evident.

Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the student will be able to retrieve the module on resubmission.

20-29% Fail
No learning outcomes fully met. Little attempt to engage with the module materials or ideas.

9% – 19%
Fail
Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice.

0-9%
Fail
No real attempt to address the assignment
brief or learning outcomes
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order

This paper is to be based on the applicable law in relation to jurisdiction (conflict of laws)
Anglo plc has its seat in England. Its subsidiary, Franco, has its seat in France. Franco wanted to invest in Deutsch, a Germany company. Deutschmark was a customer of Banko, a bank in Germany. Franco asked Bunko whether Deutschmark was financially stable. Without checking, Banko made an untrue statement that Deutschmark was financially stable.

Relying on Banko’s statement, Franco invested a large sum of money in Deutsch. Deutsch has become insolvent and Franco has lost the money invested. Anglo plc has had to put more capital into Franco to prevent Franco from becoming insolvent. Anglo and Franco wish to sue Bunko for damages for negligence.

(1)Advise Anglo and Franco on the applicable law.

(2) Would your advice be different if Franco and Banko had a contract which stated that Italian law would be the applicable law?

Please structure this as:
– Legal facts and issue
– Analysis of the applicable law (jurisdiction)
– Summary of advice (1 and 2)
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order

You are a faculty member involved with teaching baccalaureate-level nursing students. You need to develop a multiple-choice exam for a community health course that you will be teaching, see Reliability and Validity below.
For this assignment you will use selected chapters from your text from Community Health (Stanhope & Lancaster, 8th ed,). The chapter is linked here
Team : Chapter 38, Violence and Human Abuse pp. 828- 853

. 3. Reliability and Validity
A. Discuss how the test will be scored/graded to ensure fairness.
B. Based on current professional literature, discuss how validity of this test will be established.
C. Based on current professional literature, discuss how reliability of this test will be established. Be sure to include how you will evaluate item difficulty, item discrimination, and distracter effectiveness.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

choose 2 articles: 1 qualitative and one quantitative bot on same subject. Describe 5 areas of the article then place the information in an evidence table.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

1. state and describe at least three expected Climate Change affects (e.g. sea level rise). 2. state the anticipated time line of each Climate Change impact (e.g. by when could we expect how much sea level rise ) described in 1. 3. Explain how each effect described in 1. could (negatively or / and positively ) affect food and / or water security . 4. suggest a possible response Qatar could take to adapt food and water security strategy in response to each impact described in 1. Climate Change effects; 5. Briefly discuss economic, environmental and social implications of your suggestion in 4. 6. Offer concluding remarks with recommendation. 7. include at least five references to peer reviewed scientific literature sources with proper referencing and citation. be concise and no more than 1500 words.
Currently 3 writers are viewing this order