Author: chris

Order Description

Post the following:

The implications of your findings from the “Personal Change Readiness Assessment” and the “Organizational Change Readiness Assessment” related to the professional development program that you will plan to implement in this course. Is your environment and are your stakeholders culturally ready for change? Why or why not? Share information from the “Community Middle School: A Case Story of Implementation” that will inform your implementation efforts.

Your current assessment of the strengths and challenges in your school or district in supporting PLCs as a way to enhance professional development implementation efforts. Ask for advice about one or more of the conditions you described related to your school or district’s orientation to change and/or about PLCs as practiced in your school or district.

As this week’s Learning Resources emphasize, an important step in implementing a professional development program is making sure that you understand your own readiness for change as well as your organization’s readiness for change. From there, you can create, or build upon, conditions that allow the implementation of a new program or innovation to begin smoothly so that you may continue to provide the time and leadership support throughout the process.

In this week’s Learning Resources, you were instructed to complete both the “Personal Change Readiness Assessment” and the “Organizational Change Readiness Assessment” in the Reeves book excerpt. What were your results on the change readiness matrix? Reflect on these results as follows:

What are the implications of your own and your school or district’s orientation to change?

How effectively are you and your organization creating conditions for success in terms of providing time and leadership as well as fostering stakeholder (e.g., community/family) support?

What insights about personal and organizational readiness for change did you gain from reading Chapter 1, “Identifying the Need for Change,” in “Community Middle School: A Case Story of Implementation”?
Consider the role of professional learning communities (PLCs) as discussed by Shirley Hord in this week’s “Professional Learning Communities” video program. What are the strengths and challenges related to collaborative professional learning in your school or district?
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

(1) Always try to answer the question, rather than writing down everything you know about a writer or a topic. There are often key words in a question that would be useful to address in the introduction.

(2) Set out clearly in the introduction (a) what you are focusing on (a particular author or text) and (b) the direction of the essay (what you are arguing and/or what perspective you are taking).

(3) Always give the date in brackets the first time you mention a text in the essay: for example, Toni Morrison, Beloved (1987). You need only do this on the first occasion: it will help to give the essay more historical specificity.

(4) Try to organise the essay around a number of key ideas or points (for a 2000 essay, perhaps three or four ideas) and think about the most logical order of these points for progressing your argument.

(5) Always use specific examples or quotation to support your ideas.

(6) Don’t be over-reliant on a single critic, nor let them speak for ideas that you want to express or develop yourself. We want to hear your voice in the essay; critics should support and amplify your voice, not muffle it.

(7) Don’t let quotations speak for themselves. Always comment directly on long quotations to let the reader know why they are significant; a rule of thumb is that your commentary should be at least as long as the quotation. You should also double indent long quotations (those over 25 words).

(8) If you are quoting from texts then use either a footnote or endnote system for identifying the source of quotation and the page number.

(9) In the conclusion summarise what you have been arguing, but also try to make a concluding statement that clarifies or advances the argument slightly.

(10) Try to write as clearly as you can, making sure your prose conveys ideas in a precise and succinct way. It is important that you read through the essay on completing it, and rewrite or edit where necessary to ensure you have done this. If you can convince a friend to read the essay and point out areas they don’t understand or need more clarification on this is often a great help.

(11) Always include a bibliography, no matter how short. Remember published texts such as novels or published collections should be italicised (e.g. Anzia Yezierska, Bread Givers or Nella Larsen, Passing), but single poems, short stories or essays should use single inverted commas (Walt Whitman, ‘Song of Myself’, Robert Polito, ‘Last Seen’ or Mike Topp, ‘Bad Luck’).

(12) Assessed essays should normally be word processed or typed, using a suitable font and size (such as 11pt or 12pt Times New Roman). Permission must be sought in advance from the Senior Tutor for hand-written essays.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

I will sent you the 5 newspaper articles on the London Riots of 2011 to support. so you could start coding them.
-should treat the five articles as one text – i.e., you are to produce one thematic map that covers all the articles.

The next step is to generate some ’emergent’ themes
ou’re producing one map to cover all the articles; generate ’emergent’ themes from your codes from all the articles together.

Then you need to start the process of producing a Thematic Map.

You might find these reminders (taken from one of last week’s handout) helpful as you generate your map.
How do the emergent themes ‘fit together’?

Think about: levels of themes
Are some themes ‘more important’? = ‘main’ overarching themes?
Are some themes ‘less important’ = ‘sub-themes’ related to the main themes?
Remember: your first – initial – thematic map will be messy.
It is not your final map.
Refine your initial thematic map

Remember: you are aiming for themes that are internally homogeneous (cluster together similar codes) and externally heterogeneous (different from other themes).

Return to the codes and read through the transcript
Check whether your thematic map describes the data.
Remember: analysis is recursive, not linear
You may even recode some of the data at this point
Discard any redundant themes;
Combine overlapping themes;
Reduce the number of main themes
(as a rule of thumb, aim for 2-5 main themes, each of which may have a number of subthemes.)
Define and refine your themes

Describe in a sentence the ‘essence’ of what each theme is about.
Check coded data against this description to make sure it is grounded in the data set.
Your final thematic map will be the most parsimonious representation of the underlying patterns in your data se

Your submission must include the following three sections/components:

a) a visual map of your final themes (and any subthemes) showing the relationships between them;

b) a list of your themes (and subthemes) which provides a sentence describing each theme and each sub-theme, together with at at least one extract (quote) from the data to illustrate each theme and each sub-theme;

c) a list of your codes.

I’ll now say a little about each of these components.

a) visual map

You must show all themes & sub-themes within the same map – i.e., fit it all onto a single page.
I don’t care what you use to produce this map. You can use software (e.g., the drawing tools in Word), or you can trace it the sand (and photograph it). All that matters is that it is clear and readable and fits on one page of your submission.
Remember you’re producing a single map to cover all the articles.
b) list of themes (and sub-themes), with explanatory sentences and extracts.

The themes and sub-themes included here should obviously match those included in your visual map.
In your visual map you’ve given each theme (and sub-theme) a label that describes what you think it’s about. What I’m asking for here is a sentence that more fully explains what each theme (or sub-theme) is about. A short label is often ambiguous or somewhat vague, and so you need to provide a sentence for each theme (and sub-theme) that clearly and fully states what it means.
For each theme (and sub-theme) you need to select and include an extract from the original articles that exemplifies or illustrates that particular theme (or sub-theme).
For each extract identify the article it came from and its line number(s).
c) list of codes

This is simply a complete list of all your codes for all the articles. You should have this already.
This is a list of codes, NOT ’emergent’ themes.
These should be your FINAL codes – i.e., you might have refined your initial codes as you went through the mapping process.
Produce a single list of codes that covers all the articles – i.e., don’t divide the list up by article, and do remove any duplicates.
Finally, there is no ‘correct’ number of themes for your map, nor any ‘correct’ number of sub-themes for a theme. However, as a rough guide, most of you will probably have between two and five themes (and also between two and five sub-themes for each theme). If you have more than that then you haven’t done it ‘wrong’, but just check whether you can combine any themes/sub-themes.

Remember, combine all components into a single file.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

Assignment: You are to watch the following episodes of Hell’s Kitchen:
Season 11, Episode 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O4iAbzlW84&index=2&list=PL0t0H0k4dqhdWQnAIVxXdPGV- F2vtbBc1
Season 11, Episode 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KJdjskIOPo&index=3&list=PL0t0H0k4dqhdWQnAIVxXdPGV- F2vtbBc1
Season 11, Episode 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNkgNOw5l78&index=4&list=PL0t0H0k4dqhdWQnAIVxXdPGV- F2vtbBc1
Now, you are to imagine that you are an HR Consultant hired by Chef Ramsay to improve employee performance and morale at his restaurant. He asks you to observe the challenges and failures in communication between himself and his staff. Specifically, he asks for your feedback on three conflicts and/or breakdowns in communication.
What you are to do is provide him with three reports (1-1.5 pages each) that describe the problems you have observed and provide explanations on how to correct those problems.
Arbitrary Academic Restrictions: Your responses should engage with the theories and skills discussed in lecture and in the assigned readings. As a result of this being a take-home exam, I expect you to make use of the vocabulary in the textbook and the PDF files on Moodle. Your responses should be able to explain what the problem is (possibly even pointing to the location in either model of communication where the breakdown in communication occurred), provide some explanation of what factors caused the breakdown (speculate logically based upon your observations), and provide a logical, feasible method of resolution that will be positive for as many of the parties involved as can be. Yes, you can recommend employee termination if you can justify such a course of action.
N.B. While I know this will be a temptation, only one of your reports can critique Chef Ramsay for his colorful and entertaining language use. Please try to engage with communication among coworkers as well as between management (owners) and employees.

**Must write 3 separate 1-1.5 pages for each of the 3 videos

* will attach screenshots from the book with terms and information you can incorporate into the reports
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

This assignment will be assessed by means of a 2,000 ± 10% word report showing your understanding of key issues and concepts in luxury brand management and international events management.
You will be required to apply key theory, analytical techniques and innovative concepts relevant to your chosen brand and recommended growth strategy. This time you will also need to integrate international events management theory to propose a relevant event to support your brand’s growth.

The report should cover the following:

Main sections:
• Executive summary
• Introduction to the Brand
• Brand Analysis: [Including: Brand Identify, Brand Image, Brand Personality] Brand’s Identity Prism theory can be used here.
• SWOT Analysis and marketing mix 7Ps
• Recommended Strategy for Luxury Brand Development and Growth
• Proposal for International Event to support Luxury Brand Growth
• Summary of critical success factors for both the successful growth of your chosen luxury brand and the event taking into consideration contemporary issues within the luxury brand management sector
• Conclusion
• Bibliography
• Appendices with relevant further information

Other areas:
• An overview of the topics in question, including definitions where appropriate
• Evidence of additional research from sources outside of those given in the module outline, including academic and industry journals, online sources etc.
• Application of theoretical perspectives to luxury brand, including content on how the topic influences the success of the event

Rationale:
This report will be an in depth study into how your chosen luxury brands can effectively develop and grow. In addition, you will need to make a convincing proposal for an international event that will support the development and growth of your chosen luxury brand. It will help if you can summarise the factors that will be critical to the success of your brand and your event bearing in mind the contemporary context for luxury brands. The report should cover all the learning outcomes. This assessment will reveal the student’s ability to synthesise and communicate all aspects of the course/module content.
Currently 0 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

Hi there
In the first attached file are the 5 questions which need to be answered on the case which is attached in file 2. no references needed and information only be taken from the case, not from other online sources. 1-2 pages per questions, please also draw the diagrams if possible. after each questions I mentioned some models which need to be used, but it can also be more or different ones.
The “clues” are in the case study and the exam questions!!
When you see words like “macro level”, or “environmental influences”, or “key trends/drivers”, etc., The question is suggesting a PEST(LE)-type analysis
When the question contains words such as “competitive forces” or “industry structure” or “industry attractiveness”, etc., Then you should be thinking of a Porter’s Five Forces analysis
When you are asked to “critically evaluate” or to “evaluate the validity of the statement”, etc. make sure you do critically analyse or take a “stance”, i.e. “I agree or disagree with the statement for the following reasons….”
Please take at least 5 minutes to read all the questions and plan each question in the exam script!
Structure your answer:
Use first paragraph as an introduction your context/industry/organisation/ an argument/ point/model, etc.
Highlight key strategic points
Use bullet points (sparingly!) But address the “so what?” factor
Highlighters
Underlining
Capital Letters, etc.
Refer to the question during your answer to tie it together
State which tools, models, frameworks, etc., you will use to answer the question, and why, where appropriate;
Apply the models/tools, etc.
Draw diagrams (Porter’s 5F, Value Chain, Ansoff, etc.) with analysis and not just the bare framework!
Have you addressed the outcomes/implications from the models/frameworks, etc.? i.e. an outcome of a Porter’s Five Forces should be to assess the industry attractiveness and profitability plus position relative to competitors, or the outcome of Porter’s Value Chain is to identify value creating activities and hence, a firm’s strategic capabilities/competencies;
“So What?”
Tie the argument together in concluding paragraphs
Do’s and don’ts

Don’t “describe”!

Instead

Do “analyse and evaluate”, i.e. address the “so what” – what is the information or data in the case study telling you and its implications for decision making?
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

*Planning:
Before you start writing it is key to know enough about the topic to form an argument in response to the question set. Make sure you have read enough – not just textbooks or lecture notes. Planning your essay is very important. Another key step before putting pen to paper, or finger to keyboard, is to work out a structure for your essay.

Making the structure explicit will help you be clear about your overall line of argument. Equally, being clear about your line of argument will help shape your sense of structure. For these reasons IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO DECIDE THE THEME AND ARGUMENT OF YOUR ESSAY BEFORE YOU START TO WRITE. However many of you will also find it useful to try writing parts of the essay in order to work out your structure and plan your argument.
Writing a structure plan does NOT mean writing a list of everything you want to include in the essay – the ‘shopping list’ approach. Rather you need to think through the logical steps of the argument. What information or points do you need to make before you can argue a certain line? Have you considered the range of debates in the literature? How do YOU assess the arguments put forward in the readings? Are they convincing? Are they based upon adequate evidence? Apply this same critical approach to your own argument: have YOU used enough evidence (and in the appropriate places)? Have you used your material in a logical order?
As important as convincing an examiner of your knowledge of the subject you’re your understanding of the debates, it is important to keep the idea of a READER in mind. Make the ground you are writing on as explicit as possible. Spell your approach ad sources out and don’t leave the reader having to guess what you are up to, or assume she or he has an omnipotent knowledge of all possible divergent views.
Last and first, always check through that you have provided an argument in response to the question set – you cannot be awarded marks for an essay which goes off at a tangent, even if it is to another equally interesting question!

*Framework:
All essays follow the same basic framework: an introduction; a discussion that explicitly addresses the debates in the form of an argument; and a conclusion. This structure is better achieved if you have prepared a good outline.
Introduction: starts with a statement of your understanding of the subject, its importance and its implications. This is a useful place to introduce your key terms or concepts by way of making some key distinctions or definitions. It is helpful for the reader if you provide ‘signposts’ as the direction of your essay.
Main discussion: here you develop your argument and provide support (in the form of examples, research findings etc) for each of the main points of your argument. It will usually involve an assessment of the various competing and opposing analytical perspectives. If appropriate, do use headings to organise and highlight your line of argument – but beware of using headings that fragment your essay. Main ideas should have their own paragraphs. Make a clear distinction between your ideas and those of the authors you draw upon – even if your views are the same: the reader needs to see explicitly that you know what X’s argument is, and then your justification of why you agree (or disagree) with them. Sources should be identified in the body of the essay in the following way: Jones (2000); or Jones and Smith (2001: 29) – where

you make a direct quotation include the reference of the page number. Always include co-authors, not just the first named author, in your referencing.
Conclusion: this reprises the main ideas and summarises your line of argument in answer to the question set.
Currently 0 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

Should prisons be institutions of punishment or therapeutic communities that support rehabilitation for those convicted of murder and/or sexual crimes?

Students are advised to read What Works in Therapeutic Prisons by Brown, Miller, Northey and O’Neill and at least Chapter Two of The Penal System by Cavadino, Dignan and Mair. These texts will provide a substantial amount of information to support both sides of this debate. Students should consider current regimes and conditions within prisons in England and Wales, and think about how such conditions might impact those incarcerated for long periods of time. Likewise, given that most people convicted of serious crime are at some point released back into the community; students are encouraged to consider if current policy and practice can equip those convicted of serious sexual and violent offences reintegrate back into the community effectively and for practitioners to manage this safely.

Level 6 BLSS General Assessment Criteria
Classification %
Ran
ge
Content Application of
Theory
Knowledge and
Understanding
Evidence of
reading
Referencing/
Bibliography
Presentation, Grammar and
Spelling
I
(Outstanding
work) 80-
100
Critical insightful evaluation
and synthesis of issues and
material which includes an
original and reflective
approach.
Extensive evidence of
relevant and perceptive
application of theory,
and/or empirical results,
where applicable.
Exceptional knowledge and
in-depth of understanding of
principles and concepts.
Extensive evidence
of integrating
appropriate
supplementary
sources.
Outstanding
referencing &
bibliography.
Outstanding, well-directed
presentation, logically and
coherently structured, using correct
grammar and spelling.
I
(Excellent
Work) 70-79
Critical evaluation and
synthesis of issues and
material which includes
original and reflective
thinking.
Clear evidence of
relevant application of
theory and/or empirical
results, where
applicable.
Excellent knowledge and
depth of understanding of
principles and concepts.
Evidence of
extensive reading of
appropriate
supplementary
sources.
Excellent
referencing &
bibliography.
Excellent, well directed
presentation, logically structured,
using correct grammar and spelling.
II (i)
(Good Quality) 60-69
Critical evaluation and
synthesis of issues and
material.
Evidence of relevant
application of theory
and/or empirical results,
where applicable.
Comprehensive knowledge
and depth of understanding
of key principles and
concepts.
Evidence of reading
a range of
supplementary
sources.
Comprehensive
referencing &
bibliography.
Good quality presentation, logically
structured, using correct grammar
and spelling.
II (ii)
(Acceptable
Work) 50-59
Accurate description of main
issues and material with
some critical evaluation.
Occasional relevant
application of theory
and/or empirical results.
Appropriate knowledge and
understanding of principles
and concepts only.
Evidence of
directed reading
and some
supplementary
sources.
Adequate
Referencing &
bibliography.
Orderly presentation, competently
structured and acceptable grammar
and spelling.
III
(Adequate
Work)
40-49
Limited evaluation and
description of main issues
and material.
Limited evidence of
application of theory
and/or empirical results.
Basic knowledge of key
principles and concepts only.
Evidence of basic
reading only.
Limited
referencing &
bibliography
Acceptable presentation and
structure, grammar and spelling.
Condonable Fail
(Limited Work) 35-39 Omission of some relevant
material.
Very limited evidence of
application of theory
and/or empirical results.
Limited and/or superficial
knowledge and
understanding of key
principles and concepts
Minimal evidence
of reading.
Inadequate
referencing &
bibliography.
Poor presentation, structure,
grammar and spelling.
Fail
(Unacceptable
Work)
0-34 Insufficient and largely
irrelevant material
No evidence of
application of theory
and/or empirical results.
Little or no knowledge and
understanding of the key
principles and concepts.
Limited or no
evidence of
reading.
Little or no
referencing and
bibliography.
Inadequate presentation, grammar,
spelling and structure.
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

Dear Australian Writings,

The three questions for this 5000 word assignment appear below:

Question 1.
John comes into your law practice for advice. He tells you of the following series of events:
He states that he owns property in a town called Mermaidland, a town in Queensland. Some building and construction is occuring at the location. He is having renovations done to both the Commercial premises and the granny flat attached to it. The commercial premises is let, for a period of three years to “bait and Tackle Pty Ltd” under a written lease. The granny flat is let to his cousin Jack. There is no written agreement in place. The Bait shop has continued to trade, with some areas roped off with signs stating ‘Keep Out – Construction Site’ whilst John has moved out due to Workplace Health and Safety concerns. As construction continued an amazing thing happened. Bill, a workman employed by the builder, ‘Hard Constructions Pty Ltd’ found a gold bar under a concrete slab that had been removed and was to be relaid. Another gold bar (but damaged) was located behind a lose brick in the storeroom wall. Both these finds were made in the Bait shop. Ben, a subcontractor (not employee of) Hard Constructions Pty Ltd saw Bill surprise find. Ben immediately and thoroughly searched the residence. Ben found some more gold bars sitting on the coffee table in Jacks lounge room. It appeared like the bars had been extracted from the ground under the house. The floor boards next to the coffee table had been prised up. Ben found a final lone gold bar on a steel beam above the window in the main bedroom. John was inspecting the works on the day, and upon hearing the commotion, he immediately snatched the two bars from Bens hand. Upon hearing that Bill had found something as well John took all the bars which he had collected and added them to the ones he located in an unlocked toolbox on the back of Bills work ute which he sneakily searched. John immediately dismissed everyone from the site and claimed all the bars were his. This find had become so news worthy in Mermaidsville that the local news service had set up a live cross, which included a mobile camera platform which could be elavated and lowered to enable a view of the property over his 10 foot high colour bond fence. John wants this invasion of privacy to stop. Further John has received letters from legal representatives of Jack, Bill, Ben, and Bait and Tackle Pty Ltd and the Queensland Government, claiming all or some of the gold bars. John gives you the gold bars for safe keeping in your safe. They are of value. He wants to keep them all.
Provide a short description of the property in this scenario and its relationship to each person.
In 3500 words discuss John’s position in relation to the legal claims against him. You are a property lawyer confine your answer to the law of property unless some other matter is necessary in your discussion.

Question 2
Modules 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the course discuss elements of Property Law. Now consider the law under sections 10, 12, 14 and 22 (other sections may be applicable) of the Personal Securities Act 2009 (Cth). Is the Act consistent or inconsistent with the common law principles set out in the common law fundamentals in this course. Discuss any major differences or issues which may present. Cite case law where relevant. You must correlate the two bodies of law in relation to property in your answer.

Question 3
Merle comes to you with questions about clauses in her wil. You are a new expert property lawyer and she wants a written response. Merle draws your attention specifically to Clause 10 which says:
“Upon my death, I Merle Gweneth Jorgensen, direct my trustees to hold my stock market share portfolio UPON TRUST for the children of my sons in equal shares as Tennants in Common. My said grand children must agree on the operation of that stock portfolio and if they do not, then my trustees may decide any issue that shall be binding.”
Clause 10 of the will contains a clause called a residuary clause which provides that if any gift in the will should fail, then that gift should be paid to all of Merle’s children (a son and two daughters) equally. Merle tells you that she has had a falling out with her son over his lack of commitment to settling down and further she does not want him to benefit from Clause 10 via clause 12. He is unmarried and has no children.
Assume Merle has had independent success planning advice and you only need to advise on Property related matters. Provide statutory references for any of your opinions where relevant.

I can provide additional resources for questions when requested.

Paper needs to use Australian Guide to Legal Citation referencing.

I do not have a home phone.

Thankyou
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Order Description

Purpose
To assess your ability to
• Discuss the issues on the forecasting system being used by a company.
• Recommend how to improve the forecasting method.
• Develop a forecast for each month of the next year and justify the forecast and method used.
• Integrate established operation management principles into the discussion.
• Write a business report based on 5-step critical thinking decision making model.

Action Items
1. Review the Brief Rubric – Franklin Fan Company-Forecasting.
2. Read the Franklin Fan Company-Forecasting case.
Case Background: You are to take on the role of Sharon Place. Address your brief to Dan Block and Ed Spriggs.
3. Download the 5-Step Critical-Thinking Decision-Making Model.
a. Complete Step 1: Identify the problem(s) and uncertainties based on the assigned problem.
b. Complete Step 2: Obtain Information addressing the problem(s) from Step 1 and the following:
i. Comment on the forecasting system being used by the Franklin Fan Company.
ii. Suggest changes or improvements that you believe are justified.
iii. Develop your own forecast for window fans for each month of the next year, 2015. Justify your forecast and the method you used.
c. Complete Step 3: Make predictions about the future on the matrix.
d. Complete Step 4: Make decisions by choosing among the alternatives on the matrix.
4. Review the Business Brief Guidelines and Sample Business Brief for correct MBA Business Brief formatting.
5. In MBA Business Brief format, write a one-page analysis incorporating the following:
a. Business Brief header – The first half of opening paragraph is to provide a synopsis of the company. The second half of the opening paragraph is state the problem (From Step 1 of the model).
b. Analysis header – The analytical section should be based on your personal assessment of the information you obtained from Steps 2 and 3 of the model. Provide only key relevant information and logical discussion in support of your findings.
c. Conclusion header – This section should state your recommendation based on your analysis of the case information and situation outcome. (From Step 4 of the model). Your recommendation should be supported by your analysis section.
d. APA citation(s) and reference(s).
Note: You are expected to compose your Business Brief utilizing the concepts learned in MBA 707. Specifically, Chapters 4, 5, and 6 from the textbook: Bovee, C., & Thill, J. (2015). Business Communication Today (13th ed.). Bullet points and direct quotes are not to be used.
6. Check your writing style by using Grammarly and correct your business brief as needed.
7. Submit your Business Brief to turnitin.com.
a. Read the Originality Report you receive from turnitin.com.
b. Make any modifications as needed to your Business Brief. This may include adding proper citations or better paraphrasing.
8. Attach the following appendices to your paper:
a. Appendix A: Completed WK5-STUDENT SPREADSHEET-FF-FORECASTING.
b. Appendix B: Completed 5-Step Critical Thinking Decision Making Model.
c. Appendix C: Grading Rubric for the assignment.
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order