This discussion board is about argument. Here are links to two editorials – one is about environmental protection and the other is about gun silencers. Both are about policy, rolling back EPA regulations and passing a law to make silencers legal.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2017/03/10/stripping-epa-protection-endangers-next-generation/6Jwb2Lij7eZBsdQCleumgN/story.html
Choose ONE of the editorials and read it carefully. Then write a post about the argument, does the claim make sense, is the reasoning logical, does the evidence support the claim well? Also, do you agree or disagree? why? make your claim and support it.