Describes how management uses symbolic interactionism as described by Mead, Garfinkel, and Goffman to reinforce role definition and to assert dominance and control over employees.

Observe the behavior of individuals in a workplace environment or recall the behavior of individuals in a workplace environment from experience. Pay particular attention to the dress, language, including the word choice (e.g., who can joke with whom), spatial orientation, gestures, and other body language of individuals. Write a relevant and comprehensive essay (1,000-1,250 words) that describes how management uses symbolic interactionism as described by Mead, Garfinkel, and Goffman to reinforce role definition and to assert dominance and control over employees. Address the following: Insightfully describe how the employees use symbolic interactionism to imply submission. How might the employees behave differently in your chosen workplace environment if they chose to use symbolic interactionism to suggest parity with the management? Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. please view rubric below Symbolic Interactionism 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 80.0 %Content 50.0 %Essay Essay is irrelevant; fails to describe managements’ use of symbolic interactionsim and/or address the following: employee usage of symbolic inteactionsim to imply submission, and suggest parity with management. Essay is underdeveloped; minimally describes managements’ use of symbolic interactionsim. Addresses the following: employee usage of symbolic inteactionsim to imply submission, and suggest parity with management. Essay is adequate; describes managements’ use of symbolic interactionsim. Addresses the following: employee usage of symbolic inteactionsim to imply submission, and suggest parity with management. Essay is proficient and comprehensive; describes managements’ use of symbolic interactionsim. Addresses the following: employee usage of symbolic inteactionsim to imply submission, and suggest parity with management. Essay is relevant and comprehensive; insightfully describes managements’ use of symbolic interactionsim. Addresses the following: employee usage of symbolic inteactionsim to imply submission, and suggest parity with management. 30.0 %Content Comprehension Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources were used to support major points. Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Major points are not clear or persuasive. No outside sources were used to support major points. Content is not comprehensive or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but are not well-supported by outside sources. Research is inadequate in either relevance, quality of outside sources, or datedness. Irrelevant academic sources were cited. Content is comprehensive and accurate; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, up to date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. At least two relevant academic sources were cited. Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. Research is adequate, up to date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. Three or more relevant academic sources were cited. 15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5.0 %Format 2.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) GCU template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. GCU template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. GCU template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. GCU template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.